Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cristina Milani

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 23:27, 17 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Cristina Milani

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

~~Wikipedia is not a resume or CV. No reliable sources available to establish WP:GNG. PlayOboe (talk) 14:19, 3 August 2022 (UTC)~~ Blocked sock. Beccaynr (talk) 00:12, 8 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Women and Switzerland. PlayOboe (talk) 14:19, 3 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 14:36, 3 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Sources are all in German, will rely on others to review them, appears non-notable based on above. Oaktree b (talk) 15:01, 3 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete My searches found nothing to suggest notability, no reviews of the one book I found by her. CT55555 (talk) 16:05, 3 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Keep per WP:BASIC - Italian sources include a 2017 book review in la Repubblica, substantial coverage of her and her work in a 2018 article in La Stampa, substantial coverage of her and her work in a 2019 article in Elle, and her quoted substantially as an expert in a 2020 article in Corriere della Sera. There appears to be additional coverage in Italian media available via GNews. Beccaynr (talk) 01:58, 5 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Keep seems to meet at least WP:GNG as per sources found by Beccaynr. Not sure if quite enough for WP:NAUTHOR, but doesn't matter. -Kj cheetham (talk) 10:21, 7 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 21:42, 10 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Weak Keep the articles cited by Beccaynr meet GNG, albeit barely. With only one book, and not listed as a best seller, I don't think this meets AUTHOR. I'm also not so very sure that this person isn't a flash in the pan. Lamona (talk) 00:34, 13 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Keep as per sources found by Beccaynr. Suonii180 (talk) 13:12, 17 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.